Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Contraindications Clonadine And Lorazapram

UNTITLED.

aloa white man, I want to tell you what happened just hours ago.
I was there, when someone called me and mi disse perchè avevo criticato il suo operato.
E perchè lo avessi fatto a bocca aperta e non chiusa, parlandone addirittura non da solo,ma con la gente,dandomi ad intendere ciò che ciò significasse per lui; istigazione alla critica, come fosse un reato.
Ora eravamo io e lui ed io non credevo piu di tanto alle mie orecchie che alle volte le persone parlano ed uno mancandogli talvolta la bona creanza,non le sta a sentire. Eppure lui ripetè vedendosi ancora non capito, di nuovo le stesse parole, ed a quel punto pensai che a star male nel nostro paese non fosse solo il silvio,e che io non ero Veronica...preso da sgomento nel medesimo fortunato fui che a venire in mio soccorso era il tevere, forse perchè ad esso legai l'immagine saving someone you could throw in the river, not to drown, but to go for a swim to cool off a bit and finds himself, however much I do not change my mind:
I say to you, someone, if you believe that the criticism is not legitimate, you're wrong, and most of you, someone even said to be the salt of democracy, and as for his being constructive but that depends on you, or who makes it, rather than thinking about the is for the recipient, while the 'one thing that destructive criticism is censorship of criticism itself, as satire.
But then what has been said so critical?
But we sure had a real criticism, and not simple questions, which assumed some, and why not, a desire to censor some choices not taken? That is the prerogative of reviewing all of what seems humanly.
And you may ask, criticize, criticize, talk? Express an opinion? E 'educated citizen? Civil? Are those good things but you can only say but never do?
If I ask the why of something, the more I can? A - B never answer - but do not answer him - C - to meet and think "that this cacacazzi - D - tell a lie - E - quote me in court because it is prohibited - F - unleash its dogs to eat me alive and to avoid other questions - G - he says, but only if you did the first read the script ...... but letter H, - understand the question - and maybe the answer would be even more so necessary.
And then blogger writes about what we mean? not that it should be said that we would all be over so well? Instead
analysis of bloggers is the example that proves the theory, gain time and better understand, and two years ago was enough to understand the questions that were asked, rather than perceiving them as an attack on your roles.
To date more 'or less we are certain that if evaluated were those criticisms, constructive ... Then
white brother the next time you do not miss going to happen, without conscious and hold on to the low instincts of the small domain that is within each of us-you got that last present Sonny's Matryoshka?, because it's so heartbreaking to see a union capable of a similar paradox, to investigate who and why is put around to make uncomfortable questions, and then, a clarification, no personal questions, questions are public, relating to one social sphere, a community ... and then come on, how could we ever wish to inhibit even the mental faculties even the most 'elementary people not? Why is that so, were you shocked white brother, was none other than the ABC's of questions, everyone wondered why in the negotiations in two, only one decides the time and the other will suffer, not instigating it takes or some special technique of persuasion to such questions, and if your members are doing that you want me to do the dirty work, to facilitate the day? and feel that between us is just absurd that you are likely to emerge from anti-union attitude, did not it?
would be the end of the world below and above, even if the owner agrees, again because of the law, the status of workers do not believe that would otherwise have been possible, the freedom in the workplace, opinion, belief, criticism, sexual orientation, women, etc etc etc ... well at least then the owner pays you at least, the union you have to pay you and even if I am free to criticize ....
just answer the questions that often need to understand and to build, and as a group the individual in the end we gained in the result rather than to speak about yourself, for you can not answer a question asking why one is never allowed to do that domanda.E 'wasted themselves. So
white brother let it be, the criticism seems to be still lawful today, for the secular sacred, I checked online on the websites of the law, if you're good, I told you you're lucky you are in Rome and there the Tiber, but whether there is something illegal is to take people and bring them to a private meeting with too much excessive anxiety and agitated hatred, animosity to the idea that someone has dared not what was expected, to begin his little tirade that I too sensitive person, alas, prone I sense the suggestion politely inquiring timidly intimidating ..... Forget
all'orticello white brother not to think and think big.
And sorry, since we are, with the union that represents, we can say - you say you can say or need to ask permission first? - I say with the union that represents, what if one wanted to talk about it?
Of all that he has signed, and signing ever? you you can request a consultation, an idea, what do you think, you can 'say that one no longer understands what the union and the way you do, and who does it because he does, you can ask these questions or do you think white brother are inconvenient, uncomfortable, be banned?
well I will continue, I am free, freedom is expensive, but who does not have it ... I have paraphrased Andreotti, who honor !.... at least until now, it'll take a few more questions because they will begin to be prohibited, until someone does not transmit on any of those squads standing than once and that in history there have always been and once you think they have also called good !!!...
one last thing, even the penultimate, because before saying goodbye biango brother, I was reminded of a poem by trilussa that fits like a glove with my sentiment tonight ... the second last thing, is that your name is not because it represented the basic are against the master, we are working for him, but as a base, you base that is we represented inside the union itself, and therefore represents a spatial region territory a regional and a national one nation, and you base that is us, and you have to stay closer to us, because there is no base height , which in any case that I should never be higher than its height.
And then in the negotiations to decide the timing, content must be not only the land, and the battle still to be done well with them, not only with the owner ..... the speeches are long, you might think, even fight, but we must talk, talk, talk ..... biango brother and I, you reassured that despite what your fucking attitude that Monday that I know what I had to hold back and I advise you not to repeat in the future, write it here publicly, do not call me to ask me more aware of what I think and I should not say that and instead say in full freedom and respect for others, at most are always available to discuss application and wait to understand understand answers, democratically, on a personal basis without invent rules ....
I do not stop and will continue to think and speak ...... My grandfather said goodbye
Pare!
goodnight to the simple-hearted!
Fabbio

and this is the poem ....

shade.





While I usually read newspaper
spaparacchiato er shade of a pajar
or see a pig and say je: - Goodbye, Majali! - Je
see a pacifier and say - Good-bye, jackass! - Perhaps
'ste beasts nun me understand, but I feel
the Armenian soddisfazzione de
could of' things as they are without fear of
ended in priggione

0 comments:

Post a Comment